Week 2 - Onboarding. SearchAssist product
Picture this
You’re shopping online on a popular fashion app. You start typing “black jacket Men...”. The app auto-suggests "....H&M.". Wow, a black jacket from H&M is exactly what you were looking for, you click the auto-suggested option, and the screen loads.... the excitement is palpable, and you see 186 results that match your search.
You’re eager to browse them all.
Andddddddddd... half of the jackets in those search results are not black, and none of the black jackets are from H&M.
Your shopping experience is ruined.
BUT
What if you had a search assistant that makes information discovery and fulfillment conversational across websites, e-commerce, customer service, and workplaces?
That is exactly what SearchAssist, by Kore.ai, does.
What does SearchAssist do?
SearchAssist helps deliver highly relevant, accurate, contextual, and personalized search results to all users. It uses the Kore.ai proprietary technology, Large Language Models (LLMs), and Generative AI technologies to deliver next-gen search experience to various users, including employees, consumers, customer support executives, and agents.
Some of the key features of a SearchAssist application include:
The product is built with specific use cases in mind. That means one level of prioritization has been done, allowing us to target all the ICPs via the product use cases i.e, E-Commerce, Website Search, Contact Center, Workplace (employee case)
However, for the onboarding experience, we have applied a few parameters like adoption curve, Frequency of use case to our product's end-users i.e., customers, Employees, and contact center agents. The frequency of use case is low and adoption curve is high for the employee use case, when compared to other ICPs.
Therefore, for the onboarding and teardown exercise, we will broadly classify our ICPs/buyer personas as per the experiences i.e, customer experiences and the agent experiences
ICP Name | ICP 1 | ICP 2 |
Company | E-Commerce Platforms / Website Search (Customer Use Case) | Contact Center (Agent Use Case) |
Persona Position | VP, Customer Experience | Director, contact center planning |
Revenue | ~$200 - $500+ Mn | More than ~$500 mn |
Employee Size | 1000+ | 5000+ |
AOV (ARR) | $150,000 | $240,000+ |
Organisational Goals | Revenue, enhance customer experience, Increase marketing ROI, | Lowering Churn, Upselling, optimizing support costs |
Role in buying process | High | Very High |
Reporting Structure | Reports to CMO | Reports to CTO |
Preferred Channels | Email, Phone, Face to Face (later stage talks) | Face to Face (hosting dinner meetings etc.), Email, Phone |
Products used in workplace | Salesforce, Magento, Khoros, MS Office | SharePoint, Five9 (CCaaS, and WFM), Salesforce |
Where do they spend time | Ad-Age, LinkedIn, YouTube, Gartner, HubSpot Academy | Gartner, LinkedIn, Expo Events |
Pain Points | Low conversion (app open to purchase), Low repeat purchases | High AHT, High TAT, Lower CSAT (not entirely due to agents, some because of policies) |
Objectives | Improve user experience on app/website, increase conversion, increase brand awareness | Reduce AHT, repeat contact rates, Improve agent productivity & efficiency, increase CSAT, Reducing cost per agent |
Willingness to Pay | High | High |
Appetite to Pay | Very High | High |
ICP 1 - Customer Experience Use Cases | ICP 2 - Agent Experience Use Cases |
---|---|
|
|
ICP 1 - VP, Customer Experience | ICP 2 - Director, Contact Center Planning |
---|---|
Primary Goal - Financial Secondary Goal - Functional | Primary Goal - Financial Secondary Goal - Social |
WHY?
| WHY?
|
We will first look at the acquisition process teardown, and move on to the product itself. Currently, the following acquisition channels are being employed. We will divide them into two categories, i.e., Inbound and Outbound.
For the process teardown, we will only consider those processes that account for majority od deals, are controllable, and where we have visibility. Kore.ai does not do paid ads for SearchAssist specifically. Therefore, we'll broadly classify and look at
Before we dive into the tasks that happen for each deal stage, it should be noted that the BDRs, and SEs are provided with necessary access to prospecting tools, competitive comparison documents, battlecards, pricing tools, and other enablement processes. The process of sales enablement, while not perfect at this stage, is continuously improving, and must be analysed in that manner.
5% - 10%:
Outbound:
In outbound scenarios, the sales cycle begins with the BDRs sending out outbound emails to the list of clients segregated by the priority levels. For top priority categories, its the account executives (AE) that reach out directly.
Currently, for the SearchAssist product, there are no separate mail templates that are being used. Each mail that is sent out by BDRs pitches either Kore.ai technology as a whole, or the industry-specific solution modules wherever appropriate. Other than that, there is no product-specific communication for SearchAssist. This needs to be improved, and there needs to product specific, and also use case specific mail templates for different prospects.
Inbound:
In the inbound scenario, the prospects conduct their research, rely primarily via analyst reports, or their secondary research, and ultimately reach out to our teams via mail provided on our website.
Once received, a BDR is assigned to the prospect, and they address the prospect, and also share additional materials for them to go through.
Next Steps:
Ultimately, in both inbound and outbound scenarios, once the initial interaction is completed via mail, the BDRs conduct an initial qualification meeting with the prospects where the main objective is to ascertain if there is an actual need, pain point to solve for the customer, and if so, is any of our product suitable to meet and exceed the customer requirements. Once this is ascertained, the deal is moved to 10% and the respective account executive for that industry is assigned to the opportunity and same is updated on the HubSpot.
The AE then has another call where they do a deep dive discovery, understand the Budget, Authority, the exact need, and if there is a realistic Timeline to work with. Once determined, the deal is moved to 20%, and a solution engineer (SE) is assigned. Kore.ai has a dedicated team of highly experienced SEs.
20% - 30%:
The SE and the AE discuss internally to prepare a strategy for that account, and they have another discussion with the client, along with the client's broader team. This discussion's purpose is to conduct a technical discovery and showcase an initial standard demo of the solution. Within this call, they also try to understand the evaluation metrics, the decision criteria, process and see if they can identify a champion at this stage.
In this stage, the client typically chooses to either have a Prood of Concept stage or if its a large enterprise, they choose the RFP route, where they then finalize top 3 or 2 participants, and have a PoC conducted.
Kore.ai has a dedicated proposal team, and is shortlisted in the majority of the RFP projects. Once the shortlist is done, the client will request a PoC or a customized demo request based on the use case they will provide. To support the SEs, Kore.ai has a dedicated demo team, that analyses the use cases provided, and builds the demo by working closely with SEs.
The prepared demo is then presented to the client by the SEs on site or on call as agreed. Further iterations, if any, are also accommodated, and are showcased to the customer.
40% - 60%:
Once the PoC or custom demo is completed, the clients provide a confirmation if they are satisfied that the product meets their requirements or not. If they confirm, the deal is moved to the 'Technical Win' stage, and an initial commercial proposal, including the pricing, implementation approach, and anpartner introduction, is done.
If the client is not happy with the demo, they duly communicate that they don't intend to move forward as the product does not meet their technical requirements or expectations.
60% - 75%:
Once the pricing (inclusive of license and implementation) is submitted, several rounds of price negotiations take place, and both parties try to come to an agreement on the BAFO (Best and Final Offer)
If the agreement is reached, the parties start the drafting of contractual documents, and prepare for the contract review. If they do not reach an agreement, the prospect moves on to the second best vendor in the competition.
Please note that this may or may not result in our company being out of the race, but definitely the deal has ran out of the steam. There is always a possibility of the customer coming back, and a revised offer is put on the table
75-100%:
Once the contract documents are drafted, its time for the legal teams to step in. Both parties negotiate the contractual the obligations, and try to arrive at a mutual agreement.
Once the mutual agreement is reached, the information security review is initiated, and the paperwork is completed, and the documents are signed by both the parties.
Once the documents are signed, the sales leadership reviews all the deal related documents to check if they are in place, and only then the deal is marked as Closed and Won
Please click the following link or the PDF to view the product teardown slides. You have the comment access.
CLICK TO VIEW PRODUCT AND WEBSITE TEARDOWN
Project 2 - Onboarding _ SearchAssist Product Teardown.pdfReasoning:
The primary, simplified use case for the application is to fetch info as per the user query. The 100K queries per month as part of standard plan provided must be used to track and understand if the user or their customers are able to realize the value of the application. This metric shows that the enduser is indeed able to retrieve info (i.e., realize value), and is adopting it, and is continuing to use the solution, and has not abandoned it midway.
5%-10% AHT reduction within 30 days
Reasoning:
The main objective of why this solution is implemented is reduce costs. A single second reduction in AHT saves close to $100K Annually for large contact centers. A ~5% reduction measures around 20-30 seconds depending on the circumstances, and the savings this produces will range in millions for large scale contact centers. The reduction metric is clear sign that showcases the solution's value add, and indicates that the customer is more likely to continue using it given the potential savings.
Reasoning:
The ingestion of new documents indicates that the user is liking what they have seen so far, and wants to bring more information under the SearchAssist purview. This also shows a desire to continue to use the solution, and the likeliness to pay the additional amount for the potential new queries.
Reasoning:
Typically, we see that a new customer always opts to ingest standalone PDFs and Docs to understand how the solution is working and is hesitant to expose the organization's knowledge by connecting the knowledge base. If the user is deciding to connect their existing knowledge bases to the application, it indicates that they have realized the value, and are now making that commitment to keep using the application.
Adding new agent accounts within 30 days
Reasoning:
We see that customers like to conduct test vs. control experiments in the initial stages or the trial period by providing SearchAssist access to only few agents to understand if the solution is making a difference right away, or needs further fine-tuning.
We don't have an exact number of new agent account additions, as it varies from customer to customer, but the basis for this hypothesis is that the contact center is clearly able to attribute the reduction of AHT, or increase in CSAT experience to the SearchAssist application, and want to expand the access to more agents.
Brand focused courses
Great brands aren't built on clicks. They're built on trust. Craft narratives that resonate, campaigns that stand out, and brands that last.
All courses
Master every lever of growth — from acquisition to retention, data to events. Pick a course, go deep, and apply it to your business right away.
Explore foundations by GrowthX
Built by Leaders From Amazon, CRED, Zepto, Hindustan Unilever, Flipkart, paytm & more
Crack a new job or a promotion with the Career Centre
Designed for mid-senior & leadership roles across growth, product, marketing, strategy & business
Learning Resources
Browse 500+ case studies, articles & resources the learning resources that you won't find on the internet.
Patience—you’re about to be impressed.